Social networks are actively discussing a video that refers to the cancellation of a number of US programs totaling $250 million. Among them is a grant to increase transparency in Uzbekistan's cotton industry. This project started in August 2022 and was due to end in December 2026. It provided for the implementation of international labor standards in the industry. In 2022, $2 million was allocated for implementation, and another $1 million was planned for 2025. Previously, the U.S. State Department had already cancelled 139 grants worth $215 million, including a $2.5 million project in Uzbekistan to develop civic participation.
Such decisions reflect the changing foreign policy priorities of the US administration, which is increasingly focusing on domestic objectives and reviewing international support programs. Nevertheless, U.S. Ambassador to Uzbekistan Jonathan Henick stressed in an interview that bilateral relations remain strong, based on trust and respect, and the U.S. recognizes Uzbekistan's right to an independent foreign policy.
The cancellation of grants should be seen as a consequence of the donor country's domestic agenda. Of course, the principles of cultural diplomacy and grant support play an important role in the development of international relations, and such initiatives are appreciated. However, Uzbekistan has its own potential, which allows it to move forward confidently regardless of external support.
The development of civil society in the country remains a priority of government policy: in recent years alone, more than 60 normative acts have been adopted, and a legal and institutional framework has been created to support NGOs and initiatives of the population. The cotton industry, in turn, remains strategic: Uzbekistan annually produces about 1 million tons of cotton fiber (5% of the world's total), of which 800,000 tons are exported. Textile exports totaled $2.87 billion in 2023.
In general, Uzbekistan’s expert community respects the priorities of its foreign policy partners, while emphasizing the country’s sustainable domestic development.
* The Institute for Advanced International Studies (IAIS) does not take institutional positions on any issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IAIS.
